Capitalizing on goodwill and coopting a famous speech to sell products feels wrong. 

Ah, the Super Bowl. There&#39;s nothing quite like it. It&#39;s athleticism meets entertainment meets capitalism &mdash; in other words, American, American, American. But if you didn&#39;t tune in for the game or halftime show, then chances are you were only interested in catching the commercials, but hey, there&#39;s no shame in that game. The commercials are usually the best part.&nbsp;

Each year, the televised spectacular attracts more than 100 million viewers, and with so many people tuning in, it&#39;s no surprise that NBC <a href="https://www.npr.org/sections/monkeysee/2018/02/05/583302803/super-bowl-ads-2018-the-best-the-weirdest-and-the-most-complicated">reportedly charges</a> $5 million for each 30-second slot. Thus, in an effort to get the biggest bang for their buck, companies have started producing commercials that not only showcase their products but ones that also entertain and deliver a bigger message. Sadly, two companies ran into trouble with that third part (delivering a bigger message) for <a href="https://www.nfl.com/super-bowl">Super Bowl LII</a>.

How do you manage to show the world how out of touch you are? Try using a recording of a Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.&nbsp;speech to sell your trucks. Though A for effort on showcasing the many faces and places of America. However, pairing the speech with imagery of soldiers marching might not have rubbed the civil rights leader the right way &mdash; <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=73P9STckPLw&amp;vl=en">Kendall Jenner for Pepsi</a> vibes, anyone? If there&#39;s anything we can learn from Ram, it&#39;s that there&#39;s a big difference between &quot;being woke&quot; and actually meaning it. For future reference: don&#39;t trivialize someone&#39;s struggle to sell stuff, and maybe read the entire speech to make sure it&#39;s not about anti-capitalism or anything.&nbsp;

Budweiser

2017 was a year in which one environmental disaster seemed to follow another, skyrocketing &quot;tragedy&quot; to the top of every headline&nbsp;and trending topic. Many companies&nbsp;&mdash;Budweiser included&nbsp;&mdash;did wondrous things as far as disaster relief efforts are concerned (the beer company donated over 2 million cans of water last year) so why did their Super Bowl commercial need to remind us of that? Instead of &quot;doing good quietly&quot; we got a minute-long, self-congratulatory ad that likely cost more to air than was even donated. Imagine if that $5 million had been used for charity instead?&nbsp;Perhaps Budweiser is trying to appeal to its <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2018/02/04/budweisers-super-bowl-ad-is-a-plea-to-its-fleeing-customers/?utm_term=.9b5ba4eacdd1">fleeing customers</a>?&nbsp;

For both Ram and Budweiser, might we suggest some advice from&nbsp;Thomas H. Palmer: &quot;If at first, you don&#39;t succeed, Try, try, try again.&quot; No, really. Try again!&nbsp;

Two Super Bowl Commercials That Missed the Mark 

L'OFFICIEL USA May 2024 - Jackson Wang Cover

L'OFFICIEL USA May 2024 - Natalie Portman Cover

Two Super Bowl Commercials That Missed the Mark

Recommended posts for you

Pop culture

12 Facts to Know About K-Pop Star Jackson Wang

Fashion

The Fiercest Feuds in Fashion History

Fashion

How to Get the Old Money Look for Summer

Fashion

Zendaya's Best Tenniscore Looks From The 'Challengers' Press Tour

Pop culture

What Really Happened Between Taylor Swift and Matty Healy?

Pop culture

Matty Healy Reveals If He's Listened to 'The Tortured Poets Department' Yet

Fashion

All You Need to Know About the History of David Yurman Jewelry

Fashion

Camila Mendes Reignites The '70s In Coach's 'Find Your Courage' Campaign